Kenny, you like teasing us! You say you first didn't notice the links in Fabian's posting, but you can only say so after noticing them, so you knew what we were out for ;-).
Jim: I realized the x scaling thing too. But the charts comparing the toolkits directly speak for themselves. The other thing is that some of the browser specific charts (FF3.0 and IE8, to be exact) start their x axis with 1,000 rather than 0, which distorts results somewhat for the casual observer. E.g. qooxdoo is "only" twice as fast as Dojo1.3.0 on IE8, not multiple more times as the length of the bars suggest. > But I am also bummed. I was secretly hoping for a major scandal to erupt > and give qooxdoo a ton of publicity. Well, qooxdoo did its part, now it's for others to create the scandal. But I'm somewhat unsure that Ajaxian.com would bring an update to their original post, and nobody follows their comments after 2 days, so posting comments makes no sense. Well, if somebody caught their attention ... "qooxdoo trumps in Taskspeed benchmark", or something. > Congrats anyway to the qooxdoo team. Gee, we're really excited... :-) T. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
