Hello Martin,
Martin Wittemann wrote: > > Why do you think the qx.data.Array does not scale with huge data? I > guess that should be no problem as it uses the native array to store > the data. But perhaps i have overseen something. > Maybe I am wrong, but I assumed that there is a massive overhead involved if you convert a tree of, say, 10.000 nodes that consists of objects containing arrays and object, into an object structure using qx.data.Array which attaches event listeners etc. etc. ? It would be nice I was wrong. Also, I want to distinguish between a tree manipulation that is caused by the user, which should send change events, and those changes that are done programmatically in response to events. But at any rate, I did not want to change Derrell's codebase. It is enough to selectively add event dispatchers in overridden methods of the TreeVirtual API. Best, Christian -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Databinding-for-TreeVirtual-tp2886079p2906715.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
