Hi,
I agree that TreeVirtual is certainly the way to go with a tree this size,
but one thing that probably isn't initially obvious is that a 'build'
application is hundreds(?) of times faster than a 'source' one. I have a
tree with a few hundred items in it, and it takes FF about 20 seconds or so
to create the tree, while the 'build' version is near instantaneous.
(I've been meaning to do some profiling to find out why.. it's certainly in
the .add method)
Nick
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:34 PM, aditya siram <[email protected]>wrote:
> That worked! Awesome, thanks!
> -deech
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Guilherme Aiolfi <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> try to use TreeVirtual:
>> http://demo.qooxdoo.org/devel/demobrowser/#treevirtual~TreeVirtual.html<http://demo.qooxdoo.org/devel/demobrowser/#treevirtual%7ETreeVirtual.html>
>> <http://demo.qooxdoo.org/devel/demobrowser/#treevirtual%7ETreeVirtual.html>Because
>> 5000 IS a big number for web applications.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:03 PM, aditya siram <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I have a question on the efficiency of iterating through an object. I am
>>> making a small dictionary web-app. The dictionary contains ~5000 words.
>>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
