On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Derrell Lipman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:50, Fritz Zaucker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > what has been set, although I've never had a need for such thing. >> >>> Option (b) sounds appropriate. I agree there should be a way to retrieve >> I also think that (b) is more appropriate than accessing protected >> variables >> in the derived class. >> >>> It's all done programatically (by the developer) in nearly every case, so >>> the developer should know what has been set. >> >> Fact is, that the Smart table model contribution (which extends the >> simple table model) currently tries to access this.__sortMethods. This >> fails in the build version as the private names are optimized "away". > > That is sufficient justification for a need to retrieve the sort methods. > Yes, if you supply a tested patch, I will commit it. Please generate a bug > report and then attach your patch to it, for tracking purposes.
Cool, will do. Thanks, Fritz -- Oetiker+Partner AG tel: +41 62 775 9903 (direct) Fritz Zaucker +41 62 775 9900 (switch board) Aarweg 15 +41 79 675 0630 (mobile) CH-4600 Olten fax: +41 62 775 9905 Schweiz web: www.oetiker.ch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
