Fritz Zaucker wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, thron7 wrote:
Derrell Lipman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 18:09, thron7 <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Why do you want to check out bug data anyway (I would
skip the whole Bugs path if I were you)?
No one likely wants the Bugs path, but it's part of qooxdoo-contrib. I
believe that it has no business being in qooxdoo-contrib; rather it
should be in its own repository all together. Excluding certain elements
of qooxdoo-contrib is not something that we want to encourage people to
do.
Interesting. I'd put it the other way round: Checking out the entire
qooxdoo-contrib is not something I would encourage people to do. It's a
collection, and from a collection you pick.
As I frequently work on the train on my laptop, I did a complete checkout of
qooxdoo-contrib as I might want to try something I hadn't thought about
before.
I stopped doing that when somebody working on Eclipse support for
qooxdoo checked in the source code for the enire Eclipse JSDT parser.
T.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
