Hi No, at the moment it is not possible to set the order manually. But > there is a bug report for this enhancement #3258 [1]. Please add > yourself to the bug report, if you will be informed a bout the state. >
Ok, I hope this bug will be fixed soon :) Cleanups after tests are a big issue so at least the order should be fixed. > > > > The isSeeable() method is tested in our framework with the test class > 'qx.test.ui.core.Widget', so this should be possible to test. But I > don't know if it is possible to the the "appear" listener, but I think > it should be also possible to test this. > > The trick is to flush the qooxdoo queues, before you test for e.q. > isSeeable(). Otherwise the optimizations from the UI core system avoid a > rendering from the widget and a isSeeable() allways returns 'false'. I > would prefer to extend from the 'qx.test.ui.LayoutTestCase' for this > case (see 'qx.test.ui.core.Widget' as example). The benefit is that this > class has a getRoot() method to add the widget to the application root > and a flush() method to flush all qooxdoo queues. > No, it's not a matter of flushing the queues. I was aware of this problem already and put the manual flush but even like that it is not working. As I mentioned I think this is really due to the fact that it's a Popup I am testing. You can check for yourself: it won't work if you have a simple popup that should be shown on the application. Jean-Noel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
