Howdy! On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 10:09 -0500, Derrell Lipman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:58, Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Also, there is still a name to find... > Several ideas : > * java-rpc-2 > * java-json-rpc > > All of the current implementations are RpcX where X is the language of > the implementation. Until we have a multi-level hierarchy (which > Andreas Ecker has in the past been opposed, to but maybe by now he's > come to realize that it'd be quite useful for organization of > contribs) it's probably worthwhile to keep the naming consistent and > go with RpcJavaSomething... but I'd be careful with what the > "Something" is. Calling it RpcJava2 could ultimately confuse people > later when we have implementations based on both the current JSON-RPC > "spec" and the upcoming JSON-RPC version 2 spec. I would also object to call this RpcJava2. To me your RPC Java implementation appears to be an alternative to the original one, not necessarily a successor. Is this correct? As Derrell noted, it may also misleading due to the version 2 of JSON-RPC. No matter what the hierarchy of contributions would be within the code repository, your contribution, as any other, should have a unique, meaningful name. What do you think is special about your implementation that could make it into the "Something" part in RpcJavaSomething - no, not your initials ;-) ? TTYL, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
