On Tue, 18 May 2010, Derrell Lipman wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 16:08, Fritz Zaucker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Derrell,
>>
>> wouldn't it make sense to ask for addition of this directly to the
>> qx.core.Object? Or to at least add your mixin to the standard distribution?
>>
>
> I suggested initially to add it directly to qx.core.Object. Fabian's
> argument against that was that Object should be kept as small as possible,
> given that everything descends from it. It's a valid argument, although I
> suspect there is other stuff that I'd exclude from Object before I'd exclude
> this method. In any case, I could certainly add it as an available mixin.
> Why don't you create an enhancement ticket and assign it to me. I'll take
> care of it.
Cool. It's bug 3721.
Cheers,
Fritz
P.S.: I don't understand mixin's well enough, so this might be a silly
question: if I use it in my application, then the method is added to
every object in my application? Or could a mixin just have a "local"
effect on the objects of a specific class (e.g., only in those
classes, where I have a need for bind())?
--
Oetiker+Partner AG tel: +41 62 775 9903 (direct)
Fritz Zaucker +41 62 775 9900 (switch board)
Aarweg 15 +41 79 675 0630 (mobile)
CH-4600 Olten fax: +41 62 775 9905
Schweiz web: www.oetiker.ch
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
