It shouldn't make a difference. Could you provide a working Playground
sample, so other can re-create the effect?!
T.
On 07/02/2010 06:03 PM, Werner Thie wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Is it correct that the following code DOES NOT provide the wished for
> grafical effect of shifting the background image:
>
> var element = new qx.ui.container.Composite(new qx.ui.layout.Basic());
>
> var decorator= new qx.ui.decoration.Background().set({
> backgroundImage : '00.png',
> backgroundRepeat: 'no-repeat',
> backgroundPositionX: 0
> });
>
> element.setDecorator(decorator);
>
> //later we call
> element.getDecorator().setBackgroundPositionX(10);
>
> whereas the following code DOES shift the background image:
>
> var newDecorator= new qx.ui.decoration.Background().set({
> backgroundImage : '00.png',
> backgroundRepeat: 'no-repeat',
> backgroundPositionX: 10
> });
>
> element.setDecorator(newDecorator);
>
> Is the latter one the preferred method or did I overlook something?
>
> Thxs, Werner
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> qooxdoo-devel mailing list
> qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
