Hello Christian,
I guess its a bit early to discuss the reimplementation of the RPC layer 
because its scheduled for december which is quite a long time. But anyway, I 
appreciate your thoughts and help because I think I can only profit of your 
experience in this area.
My general idea is to be fully standard compatible so we can use every standard 
compliant server. I believe that those guys made the spec should have thought 
about all this issues and had found a good way to get it done. We only have to 
figure out what they thought. :) Thats my current plan because at the moment 
I'm not really into that topic of transport layer and RPC and whats 
additionally needed.
Regards,
Martin


Am 29.07.2010 um 08:21 schrieb panyasan:

> 
> Since Martin has mentioned that the json-rpc layer will be rewritten to
> conform to spec 2.0 and to remove non-standard behavior, I wanted to discuss
> the following point ahead of time:
> 
> At least two things are "non-standard" in the current implementation that
> Derrell has designed: the JSON date encoding and the "server_data" property
> of the jsonrpc request. I don't have strong opinions on the Date issue -- I
> know Derrell does ;-) -- but I am relying heavily alot on the server_data
> (data sent in addition to the service method request to the server). This
> data is used to send session data which is of no interest to the individual
> method called, but important for my server to distinguish between
> authenticated and non-authenticated requests. 
> 
> Since this feature will certainly be removed (not being part of the official
> jsonrpc specs), I want to make sure there is a replacement. Since we're
> using HTTP, one solution could be to move the server_data into cookies or
> HTTP headers which can then be picked up by the server side. 
> 
> Any other ideas how json-rpc "meta-data" that might be necessary to keep
> state can be implemented compatible with json-rpc?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christian
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Rewriting-the-JSON-RPC-layer-compatibility-issues-tp5346941p5346941.html
> Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
> _______________________________________________
> qooxdoo-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to