Hello, > This may be important benchmark for jquery style of programming, > because qooxdoo widgets have direct access into dom elements.
Well, its the base layer for all of qooxdoo so it is important, also to the UI part of the framework! > What I'm saying is number of DOM elements needed for an application. > Try these demos and compare speed with qooxdoo: > > http://www.sencha.com/products/js/ > http://www.linb.net/CodeSnip/ > http://ukijs.org/examples/core-examples/splitPane/ > http://www.smartclient.com/index.jsp#_Welcome I know most of these frameworks and haven't seen a better performance than we have. And btw. comparing the split pane is not a good idea. We know that the split pane can not be as speedy as we don't use CSS for our layouts. > Maybe these toolkits are simpler than qooxdoo, but they are proof that > qooxdoo can be more efficient;) Maybe the comfort qooxdoo offers has a price? Why is that a proof it can be more efficient. Regards, Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
