Small idea here.
It is possible to use generator to generate valid javascript files
which can understand these IDEs? I mean to have a precompiled file(s)
which will not be ideal for development, but can be used by IDEs to
make code assist working.
For example:
qx.Class.define("ns.MyClass", {}...)
will be translated to
nc.MyClass = function() {
...
};
nc.MyClass.prototype.something = function () {} ...
I tried spket some days ago, but the code completion is still very
basic and it don't work for my classes (it only works for qooxdoo
classes).
Best regards
Petr Kobalicek
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:48 PM, thron7 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/31/2010 04:03 PM, Mumuney Abdlquadri wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> About a year ago I tried qooxdoo and found out that it has lot of good
>> stuff. The two downsides for me is typing long names separated with
>> dots(I think thats an issue with javascript) and having to move
>> between text editor an command line. So I decided to search for an IDE
>> to no avail (all the advertised do not work at least for me). I
>> settled to create support for it in netbeans. With what I have you can
>> do most of the generate jobs direct from netbeans(this solves the
>> command line issue). But long-typing which can be solved by
>> code-completion is not solved because I think there is something with
>> the way qooxdoo team writes their javascript(not sure).
>>
>> Why did I come to this conclusion? Recently google opensourced their
>> closure which is as large as qooxdoo itself. just adding the source to
>> my project gave code completion right away which is what the netbeans
>> team are always proud to say that their javascript editor can
>> code-complete any library out-of-the-box. The question is if netbeans
>> can code complete closure why not qooxdoo. I am about to give up on
>> the netbeans integration project.
>
> Hi Mumuney,
>
> thanks for making the effort. The issue with qooxdoo's classes is that
> they do not appear as symbols *statically*. Rather, they appear as
> strings, in the first argument to calls to factory methods
> qx.(Bootstrap|Class|Theme|Interface|Mixin).define(). So, in order to
> have these symbols in auto-completion, you'd need to extract them from
> these .define() calls. It's quite easy using a regex, but this is
> probably different from e.g. Closure.
>
> I don't know nothing about Netbeans, but they surely scan a JS library
> for defined symbols. Maybe the qooxdoo symbols could be added to this
> process?!
>
> T.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________
> qooxdoo-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
