panyasan wrote: > > Hi, > > I was trying to solve this question once, using a comet/server-push-like > mechanism. I built a "databinding" layer on top of the TreeVirtual and the > Table widgets which manipulated their internal cache incrementally. Parts > of this can be seen in the "virtualdata" contrib. However, this involved a > lot of hacking that didn't seem "right" to me, and I don't plan on > developing this any further. > > I know this doesn't solve your immediate problem, but according to Martin, > a remote table and tree using databinding "across the wire", with dynamic > updates of the client-side model data is planned within the qx.virtual.* > infrastructure. I have pushed off all ambitions in this respect until this > is solved "the right way" within the databinding architecture. > > Cheers, > C. >
Is there any work started on that? If I'm going to hack around I can as well do it along the lines and contribute back. -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Dynamic-updates-to-Remote-model-of-Table-tp5549949p5554018.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
