On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Marc Puts <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 01:38 AM, Jeremiah Dodds wrote: > > Wouldn't this happen in the source version as well? Unless you mean > > you can't call private methods > > *at all* in the build version, which would seem ... ridiculous. > > > > From my experience, the source version does not raise errors when you > access private members from outside a class. > On the one hand, that's a bad thing, but on the other hand, it does make > it easy to do some quick & dirty calls during debugging. Hmm, I'll keep that in mind. On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Guilherme Aiolfi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unless you mean you can't call private methods *at all* in the build > version, which would seem ... ridiculous. > > Well, you can if you are in the same class as the private method > declaration. > Otherwise, why would it be ridiculous? If it's private! It shouldn't be > called anyway. > Right, I meant that if it was throwing an error in the build version because he was calling a private member from outside a class, that I would expect to see that error in the source version as well -- it's not like the call isn't there in the source version.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
