Hi Aditya, it's always about programming style and experiences. I can imagine horrible qooxdoo app and nice jquery app. The thing you are talking about here is related to algorithm used to display the table - Virtual architecture opens doors to million of records, but there is no difference between the UI framework when used.
I think that the most important thing is productivity. Best regards Petr On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:12 PM, aditya siram <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm seeing more and more discussion on large Javascript apps [1] with > almost no mention of Qooxdoo. People instead want to do horrible > things like build a huge app out of jQuery. At my job we needed a > table on the client-side that could handle 50,000 rows (don't ask me > why), qx.ui.table.Table was upto this (with some hand-holding) when > both YUI and jQuery failed. This framework needs to become a standard > tool and I fear that it might get left in the dust. To those that use > Qooxdoo, please rustle the bushes (blog, tweet whatever). If you > don't, you might one day be maintaining that 100K line jQuery app :). > > -deech > > [1] http://blog.rebeccamurphey.com/on-jquery-large-applications > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > qooxdoo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
