Hi, I'm currently subclassing the qx.fx package to integrate the new experimental mozilla API for javascript animations (=> mozrequestanimationframe).
I noticed it could be easily done by modifying the following classes: * qx.fx.queue.Queue * qx.fx.Base However, I just noticed that the qx.fx.queue.Queue.add() method tries to modify protected variables _startOn and _finishOn of the effect to be added - to correctly handle delays I guess ? The problem is modifying _startOn and _finishOn wouldn't have any impact on the current effect because these member variables aren't defined as protected but as private ones. So, I suspect the loop method in the effect class (qx.fx.Base) would always trigger the fx immediately, not taking into account the possible delay property. So, the correct way to do would be to modify the private variables __startOn and __finishOn in protected ones in qx.fx.Base... Maybe I'm wrong - I prefered posting it on nabble before any further tests :-) ... Any ideas ? Best, Benoît. -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/possible-bug-in-qx-fx-Base-tp6190142p6190142.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
