Robert Nimax wrote: > > Hi, > I do not think, you can do it. Even the"refine" key of a property will > only affect the initial value. > You should really think about your class design. If there is a property > of another type in the sub class you should give it another name, > because it is a different property and the semantics are different. > Furhtermore if you´d change the type of a property in a subclass how > can you be shure that there will be no problem if the base class uses > this property ? >
Of course, I take into account this kind of problems (base class calls, ...). I planned to make base calls when the incoming value was of the original type and call the whole new process in the new case. Let me explain: the parent class is present in the main framework and I don't want to completely rewrite it to keep some consistency between my developments and future evolutions of the main qx framework... -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/the-best-way-for-properties-real-overwritting-tp6367889p6368038.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
