I understand what you say about private methods and javascript all-public nature.
But the idea I had about mixins changes. I though it was like #include in php (literally). (this is, like copying and pasting the minin code into the class before "compiling" it, so the private in the mixin is also the private into the class) Now I'll take is as OOP, that is, obviously, different. (The private in OOP can't be inherited, this is a big difference!) I've already changed my code from __x to _x and everything worked fine. Thanks! Regards, Herman -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/cannot-build-production-version-because-mixin-look-to-be-missed-from-build-tp6391844p6393751.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
