On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:25, Ron Whittaker <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Derrel,
> just (basically) one more question about the new and old virtual trees:
> Are you saying that I should use qx.ui.treevirtual.TreeVirtual for a
> project that will be developed within the next two months?
> But qx.ui.virtual.* is better designed and the old
> qx.ui.treevirtual.TreeVirtual will be deprecated at some point?
>
I think which one you choose may depend on what your needs are. The new
virtual tree is no longer marked "experimental" IIRC, so it is supposed to
be ready for prime time. If it meets your needs, it uses the modern data
binding scheme that is spreading throughout qooxdoo, and may well be the
better choice. If not, TreeVirtual works well and will not likely be
deprecated any time soon, since it has been a highly popular widget.
> Will the transition from qx.ui.treevirtual.TreeVirtual to qx.ui.virtual.*
> be easy from the user perspective (not talking about the widget developer
> side), or does the change involve application-wide changes?
> And you didn't mention qx.ui.tree.VirtualTree which I asked about. How does
> this relate to qx.ui.virtual.*?
>
I believe that qx.ui.tree.VirtualTree begain life in the qx.ui.virtual.*
namespace. In any case, yes, it's the new one I'm talking about.
Derrell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
