Hej Dietrich!
>So as I'm only searching for a way to structure code and logic of the
>app the "qooxdoo way" I'll only use qxoo without ui wrappers for
>Titanium.UI etc. which should have less memory consumption then your
>Ti.UI wrapper version.
yes, it will be even leaner. Good choice if size is very important.
>As for the first prototype of the app I've used John Resigs simple
>javascript inheritance implementation
>(http://ejohn.org/blog/simple-javascript-inheritance/) which lacks
>support of properties with automatic getters and setters, mixins,
>singletons et. al. but has a small code footprint.
Also a very good choice for the purpose.
The question is what next generation of your app will look like. Is your above
choices right for
future developments of your app or does it increase work load later on? This I
think is the most
important question for you now... We decided to try to make it universal
already now and therefore
put in the big efforts at start.
>Do you have any apps already distributed in the app store?
Not yet until we finished our thorough testing. Expected to be launched in Dec
in the app store.
We will tell you then...
Stefan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
