It look like the js code coverage was in the air. Here is what i just found in my feeds http://olabini.com/blog/2011/11/announcing-jescov-javascript-code-coverage/
Le 11 novembre 2011 10:56, thron7 <[email protected]> a écrit : > Well, I think we *could* ;-). - But not out of the box. This requires a > different kind of machinery. For one you'd need to record which methods > of a class have been called. For another, you'd have to match this up > against the entire public API of the class. And this would only be > covering the list of methods. It wouldn't tell you which code paths have > been taken through any specific method that was invoked. So, a coarse > code coverage. I think the aspect system of qooxdoo (qx.core.Aspect) > could be used as a basis for this. > > Patches welcome! :-) > > T. > > On 11/11/2011 04:22 PM, Benjamin Dreux wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Since qooxdoo now have unit test that can run in command line. >> I'm wondering if we could have some kind of code coverage mechanism ?? >> >> Regards >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > qooxdoo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel > -- Benjamin Dreux Analyste-Programmeur Chaire de logiciel libre-Finance Social et solidaire UQAM Montréal ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
