Hi Omri, no, but I would use qx.core.Init.getApplication(). ;)
Cheers, Chris Am 28.11.2011 16:58, schrieb omrihar: > Hi Chris, > > Thanks. In the meantime I realized I can simply use > window.application=this; > in the main function of the standalone application. > Is using qx.core.Init.getApplication() better? > > Thanks, > Omri > > -- > View this message in context: > http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Calling-getRoot-from-child-qx-ui-window-Windows-tp7038449p7039224.html > Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > qooxdoo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
