Leon Woestenberg-2 wrote > > Like with all open-source, there must be a good reason to invest time in > it; either you have fun doing it, or it earns you some money, or both. > > I think it's already excellent that the people at 1&1 have put their > Qooxdoo toolkit/frameworks in the open, and also have time to respond to > absolute beginners like me. >
Hi Leon, you're absolutely right, the qooxdoo support is fabulous. It is great you're making rapid progress with your remote databinding implementation. It is also true that one should roll up one's sleeves and get to work rather than complaining. However, as I have argued in my other posts, I think that everybody would profit enormously if these efforts would be coordinated by clear architectural design decisions. If there are a lot of different, handmade solutions, the term "remote databinding" loses any meaning - at the end, we have load and save actions triggered by client databinding, but not a consistent technology. Do you see what I mean? Best, Christian -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/How-to-remote-data-binding-for-widgets-in-general-tp7366145p7382119.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
