Sorry, I didn't say WHAT the difference was! 1.6 uses name: "1.foo" and 2.0pre "[1].foo". However, in the playground example, I cannot reproduce the behavior ( name: "2.foo") that I am reporting in my earlier mail. Strange, I need to investigate ...
The wrong unshift() behavior, in contrast, is reproduced. -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/databinding-changeBubble-event-details-tp7540785p7542091.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel