Thanks, Thomas, for the clarification. This wasn't apparent to me, although I have been following the project for a long time (actually, since version 0.5).
I can see the point of your reasoning, but it doesn't fully resemble what I have experienced so far. I always had the impression that you as the core team had a very definite idea of what it was you were trying to achieve and of the features you wanted to implement. Yes, there has been the occasional wish from the community, but the main ideas were always yours (driven by company needs or own reasoning about what needed to be done). There are plenty of bugs with feature requests that have been there forever [1]. Don't get me wrong, I think this is perfectly ok and it is what has made qooxdoo what it is. I wasn't fully aware of whether you filed bugs for your own targets or not. And it would seem to me that something like contrib2.0 is not just about doing us a favor, but actually a very important framework decision that might have very beneficial consequences (in terms of number of contributions) But now I know more and I am happy to file that famous bug that got it all started. :-) [1] For example, http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5416, or a "Virtual Table" -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/the-contrib-site-tp7580681p7580780.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
