Hey,
> ....does not work and emits the behavior described....And of course,
> properties aren't supported with qx.Bootstrap.....
>
Thats right. :)
> Slight overstep on my part, so indeed I was reading the docs incorrectly.
Still, we need to enhance the docs about the define method. There are not
enough samples and text to give a clear picture.
> Should also note, you MUST have a members{} block defined (it can be
> empty...) for q.define() to return a function prototype. Without it,
> it returns the object I described yesterday. So a combination of
> trying to use properties AND omitting members{} is what led to the
> confusion.
Sure, otherwise its defined as a static class and this does not need to be a
function.
Regards,
Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
