@Loren Schlomer : Not sufficient for me : the var cannot be put into extended way (=available for full object) and remains located into the function's scope. Doing more (extending into object scope), will lead to a source modify which I don't want in this way. Seconds it's getting little bit unclear, while putting into preprocessor would lead to a "clarified" situation : all namespace shortcut are placed in a separate container (the preprocessor comments). Third I've no idea (but I guess) the qooxdoo builder will fail to optimize that code right ? Not sure just guess but it seems legit...
So I already think about this one, but definitely not something I want, at least a good start. @fritz : That's the point, I don't want to add something unused, adding unused code is the worst case. The time is not a big deal for me, also Qooxdoo is our main system for client side so maintain is also not a big deal. For now I'm facing out two main problem : for now the qooxdoo source & builder are not modifying code, only checking right ? So it means I will have to get a full development from scratch, which takes times but can help for other ideas... But if nobody use it, that's worthless... -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Qooxdoo-using-namespace-IDEA-tp7582389p7582398.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
