Hey, until now, we did not run into any performance issue using mustache. Do you have any problem with it? We do have good experiences with mustache and its a well known and easy way to upgrade. So as long as we don't have any issue, I would not see the need of a change here. Regards, Martin
Am 01.03.2013 um 17:43 schrieb d2 <dc...@oxys.net>: > Hi, > > Why not replacing mustache with hogan ? hogan is 100% compatible with > mustache but much faster. > > http://jsperf.com/hadlebars-vs-hogan-vs-mustache/2 > > Apache 2 for hogan MIT for mustache. > > If you agree I can work on this and send a pull request. > > David > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Mustache-vs-hogan-tp7582978.html > Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > qooxdoo-devel mailing list > qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
