Hello !

I'm evaluating qooxdoo for use it on a project and I like the overall
functionality ready to use.

After reading briefly the first chapters of the manual I've tried to make a
small test a coding a container with a label and two buttons with a custom
look and feel, I endup with around 30 lines of code and found it a bit
verbose, I would prefer a declarative way of doing it like the ones that
tried to it with xml for example.

But better than that I would prefer some kind of wysiwyg builder like the
qxIDE, so I decided to try to make qxIDE to work with qooxdoo 2.1.1, after
some intents I could reduce the errors a bit but I'm not sure if the
generated bootstrap code was hand edited in the original qxIDE because it
give errors that seems to be related to inclusion order of the dependencies.

Overal I did not got a good experience about the possible problems that can
arise form the automated generated code and that makes me delay the
consideration of using qooxdoo.

Some tools like the playground are very useful but having something like
qxIDE would facilitate a lot for newcomers.

Why qxIDE was not adopted by the qooxdoo team (it seems abandoned) and make
it part of the official distribution ? With a tool like that qooxdoo would
get a bigger audience and probably that would benefit the future of it.

Look at this page for an overall evaluation of available frameworks
http://javascriptures.wordpress.com/2012/05/17/great-javascript-ui-frameworks/
.

Cheers !  



--
View this message in context: 
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Evaluating-qooxdoo-for-a-project-tp7583889.html
Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to