Hi Tobias,
i think it is because the property "name" of the mobile Widget:
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/current/apiviewer/#qx.ui.mobile.core.Widget~getName!method_public
Just give you property and getter a different property name, and everything
should work fine.
And: Please make sure to call this.base(arguments) inside your NavigationPage's
constructor.
Greetz Christopher
Am 03.02.2014 um 09:59 schrieb Tobias Roeder
<roeder1...@googlemail.com<mailto:roeder1...@googlemail.com>>:
Hello folks,
everything that follows is regarding qooxdoo mobile 3.5
I'm facing a rather weird problem at the moment and therefore I would need some
help.
I have 2 qooxdoo classes.. One with a registration form and another one with a
"myData" form, which is displaying the personal data of a already registered
user.
Both of these classes have textfields and other formelements (declared private
with __name) with the same names! Normally, to my understanding, not a problem.
When i initialize these form elemente in both objects, i use "__name = new
formelement(); "(formelement being a textfield, button, label etc.. standard
qooxdoo classes).
Now i noticed, that when i create my objects, and call the getter for, lets
say, the phone number, i only receive the value of the last initialized
object.. no matter whose getter I call..
To make this a little clearer:
__registrationPage = new myproject.views.registrationPage();
__myDataPage = new myproject.views.myDataPage();
(both of them being own classes extending NavigationPage)
__registrationPage.initialize();
__myDataPage.initialize();
(making the view available before calling the .show() method)
__registrationPage.getName(); <-- returns the value of the textfield name in
MYDATA-PAGE, which is just WRONG
__myDataPage.getName(); <-- returns the value of the textfield name in
MYDATA-PAGE, which is correct.
The getters aren't standard property getters, but selfcoded getter which return
the value of the corresponding private textfield of the navigationpage.
I figure i might have to declare the instance variables differently.. maybe
involving the THIS operator somehow? I just cant seem to find the correct way..
Somewhere along the line qooxdoo overrides the (to my understanding private)
variables and doesnt treat them as two different things (which they were
supposed to be).
I'm most likely going to use properties for this particular matter to avoid the
problem but it worries me that I am obviously declaring instance variables in a
wrong way, since they are overridden no matter what class they belong to.
Any ideas? It is most likely just a small alteration...
Thanks in advance!
Greetz,
Tobias
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
