Hi Andreas, Thank you for clarifying things up.
As you mentioned, 1&1 was the driving factor in qooxdoo development so far. You talked about the plan to move qooxdoo more towards a community driven project. That's a good decision. I agree. On the other side 1&1 allowed the project to have much appreciated members like Martin, Alexander, Daniel, Thomas, Mustafa, you and others spending most, if not all of their working hours on qooxdoo, while being employees of 1&1. Reading somewhat pessimistic "between the lines", one may get the impression that 1&1 will cut down the spent man power for the qooxdoo project. Is qooxdoo still and will it be in the future a framework used by 1&1? Are you willing and allowed to comment this? Regards Dietrich PS.: My English is suboptimal. I apologize if what I wrote seems aggressive or offending. This is not my intention. I just try to talk straight. Am 13.11.2015 um 12:38 schrieb Andreas Ecker: > While qooxdoo has been - and always will be - an open-source project, it > used to be largely dependent on 1&1 as its initiator and single maintainer > of the project. That's not bad pre se, as it allowed qooxdoo to become > such a mature and enterprise-grade framework. But nowadays the project > would benefit more from a thriving open-source community that were able to > contribute and influence its progress also based on the requirements of > the real-life qooxdoo projects most of you have in production. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
