We certianly have awareness of tasks that need to be prioritised for the
jms client. As soon as there's a project tracker/jira on Apache that we
can use we can start there.
On the maven front, I just want to (sorry but feel very strongly) state
that any work on the build system must be isolated until complete & tested
on all platforms. I cannot go back through build related pain :-)
Regards,
Marnie
Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/09/2006 21:53
Please respond to qpid-dev
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: maven
Kim, questions (c) and (d) are good ones, making me wonder whether
there is a list of to-do items somewhere that we can transfer into
Qpid JIRA, assuming we get that set up soon? That way the group would
get a much better idea of how much work there is to do, so we can
better prioritize it.
--steve
On Sep 8, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Kim van der Riet wrote:
> While the advantages of Maven seem clear, the question becomes:
>
> a) How much effort will it take to implement Maven at this stage?
> b) What is the risk of disruption to the development process if there
> are hiccups?
>
> If the answer to these questions is little effort, little risk,
> then it
> seems to make sense to go ahead and make the change - if someone is
> willing to do so. If the change involves significant effort and/or
> risk
> of disruption, then I would also ask the following:
>
> c) Does Maven bring any immediate advantages to the project that could
> help it along?
> d) Is the effort spent implementing Maven better spent elsewhere on
> the
> project right now? There are still many holes and fixes that are
> urgently needed, and would it not be better at this juncture to rather
> concentrate on the "nuts and bolts" issues?
> e) Is it wise to introduce another major system change at the same
> time
> that we switch our source from 108 to Apache?
>
> Given the general support for Maven and the advantages it brings, this
> is not a question of "if" but of "when". Lets consider whether this is
> in fact the best moment for such a change.
>
> Kim
>
> On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 08:59 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
>> Steve,
>>
>> "You said Maven doesn't help us at this stage. In response gave 10
>> good
>> reasons why it does." - all I wanted
>> was a window do get the code move done, thus should have said, adding
>> maven now does not help ME in the
>> code move. We all know the merits of maven. I am appreciative that
>> you
>> are willing to work out what the
>> project will look like.
>>
>> Carl.
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an
offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or
as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and
other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are
subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not
necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and
affiliates.
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including
any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and
any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no
responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and
affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its
use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the
sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard
copy format. Thank you.
