Good point, I'll do a bit more homework. Thanks for the pointer.
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 10:59 -0400, Steve Vinoski wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Alan Conway wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 08:17 -0400, Kim van der Riet wrote:
> >> Overall I'm do not mind what dir structure we use, so long as its
> >> consistent and easy to maintain. Would you say that this is more
> >> "standard" for C++ projects?
> >
> > More common in my experience but there really is no "standard" :( I'm
> > going to think about this a little more before making the change.
>
> Agreed -- there is no "standard" in this space that I'm aware of.
>
> Alan, do you plan to avoid recursive make? If you're changing the dir
> structure you might also consider fixing that as well.
>
> <http://www.pcug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html>
>
> --steve
