> I see quite a lot projects don't do this so I filter on the reply-to.
That works if you want to use inbox rules thich will file stuff for you. I have tried that, but the problem is, I don't look into that folders than and miss a lot. Well, this is personal preferences. What's even worse: Some projects don't change the reply-to header to point to the list, which is VERY annoying as you hit "reply" and you think you replied to the list, but you replied to the individual sender. Ok, Apache gets this right, fortunately. > Can the list server add this for us? Yes, definitely! The Apache stanadard would be [Qpid-dev] and [Qpid-commits], probably later [Qpid-user] or [Qpid-users]. Regards, Torsten -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:18:26 -0400 Von: Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [Qpid] in the subject line? > > I see quite a lot projects don't do this so I filter on the reply-to. > Can the list server add this for us? > > Carl. > > Torsten Schlabach wrote: > > Because I personally (like many other people I know) am subscribed to > > a lot of mailing lists and I get a lot of mails. The [Qpid] or > > [Cocoon-user] or whatever lets me immediately recognize that this mail > > belongs to that subject, especially if people use quite generic > > subject lines such as "Getting a website" or "Compilation problem". > > > > It has been good practice in other Apache projects and in lots of > > other projects as well. And IMO it does not hurt. > > > > Regards, > > Torsten > > > > Carl Trieloff schrieb: > >> > >> wondering - why should we? > >> > >> Torsten Schlabach wrote: > >> > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> This mailing list does not have something like [Qpid] on the subject > >>> line of messages, as most Apache lists have. > >>> > >>> Is that by design? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Torsten
