On 25/09/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So it sounds to me that something like CMS can still abstract out your protocol but still give you access to all the features of you broker. The destination just needs to carry the exchange, and routing info.
I'm not sure what you are getting at. I was just trying to state facts about the JMS Destination abstraction without getting philosophical :). It's easy to get wrapped up in the thought that a "destination" is simply somewhere you send stuff. Equally, it's easy to get wrapped up in the thought that a "destination" is a physical queue for sending/receiving.
