Agree. No it wasn't really meant to be an acronym, although there were some ideas for an acronyn thrown around like product information delivery or something like that. Let's see if everyone else agrees with the spelling "Qpid" and we can adjust the logo concepts accordingly.
Is there any existing documentation on qpid? that would be also be useful as we build out the content on the wiki and the web-site. Deb On 10/5/06, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Qpid seems right to me. QPid or QPID suggest an acronym which I don't think is what we're going for? On 05/10/06, Debbie Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There were some discussions about it during the renaming process, but there > doesn't seem to be consistent usage. I agree it is important to have a > consistent name and spelling. I can have a design firm come up with some > logo concepts over the next couple days. I've been involved in the AMQP > logo and branding discussions as part of the AMQP Working Group. > > I personally like Qpid, which is what Eric put on the project web-site > docs. Does anyone disagree with the usage of the project name spelled > Qpid? > > Debbie > > On 10/5/06, Marnie McCormack < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I wondered if there's been a conversation on any mailing list about Qpid > > branding (logos etc) ? I remember a debate about amqp branding on the pmc, > > but haven't spotted any Qpid discussions. > > > > I noticed that across the various contributers' websites and press > > releases > > we don't seem to be consistent about the case i.e. QPid, qpid, Qpid etc. > > > > Do we have a clear agreement on the branding for Qpid ? > > > > Regards, > > Marnie > > > > > > -- Martin Ritchie
