We need to understand how to deal with features in the Java and C++ brokers.
Is it done when its done in one of them? John On 10/10/06, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/10/06, John O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These spring to mind: > 1) Complete local transaction support (XA not urgent at all) What do think is missing? > 3) Staging for larger messages (will benefit from the work happening on the > protocol content classes over at AMQP.ORG) This is part of QPID-17 which I am working on. > 4) JMS Compliance (approximate first so people familiar with JMS don't get > surprises; not aiming for TCK compliance of any sort on a first run, plus we > don't have the TCK :-) We are doing pretty well on JMS compliance. The major outstanding item is message selectors which we have discussed at some length on the list. I will raise a Jira for it. We also need queue browsing which has been discussed before and I think will "come out in the wash" with our content class redesign proposal. RG
