On 10/16/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kim has been working on a new generator and updated framing which should be in, in a few days. Might be worth waiting for that to eliminate rework. He has wiki page on it.
waiting?? I'm done! lol! Carl.
Hiram Chirino wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to let you guys know that as the first step for ActiveMQ to > support the QPID protocol, I made a more decouple version of marshaling > generators that qpid implemented. You can find the work here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/sandbox/qpid > > Major differences between it and the original qpid versions are that > (1) it does not depend on MINA, or any of the qpid internals > (including the > qpid exceptions). > (2) it follow the pattern of separating the command logic from the > marshalling logic. This is a pattern that has proven useful in our > openwire > protocol. > (3) supports calling a visitor for faster/type safe command processing > (4) command properties now have getters and setters for better > encapsulation > (5) all commands now inherit from Frame (simplifies and reduces object > creation) > > Ideally It would be nice if qpid could maintain nicely decoupled > marshaling > package like this. That way, ActiveMQ could just pick it up and use it. > But it's not a big deal for us to maintain so if it's not picked up, it's > not a big deal. > > The module also includes integration into activemq where we add > support for > a 'qpid' transport which understands the amqp protocol using the > above. A > small Main that starts up an ActiveMQ transport proxy was used to verify > that marshallers work. The proxy unmarshalls to the command objects > and the > forwards which cases the same object to be remarshalled. > > Now that we can talk the talk.. it should not take long for ActiveMQ to > directly support AMQP also. >
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
