On 10/20/06, John O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Important Note: - AMQP is NOT and interoperability protocol in the same way that NFS, SMTP and HTTP are not interoperability protocols. If AMQP were an interop protocol it would have a very wide tolerance for semantic variation, and a lowest common denominator sweet spot; which is definitely not the case. If you want interop, look at WS-I.]
This note confused me - maybe I've got the wrong end of the stick. So are you saying that the point of AMQP is not really about interop between messaging providers (such as IBM, BEA, TibCo, Sonic et al) and for that we should use WS-I (or JMS which is how most people bridge them today) - that its more a case of making some new messaging providers that speak the same wire protocol? -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
