Thanks. In both 5 and 8 thread cases there's a steep linear climb after 2 clients, which is not good. Java is starting to climb after 4 but not nearly as steep.
I'm investigating! On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 16:58 +0100, Robert Greig wrote: > On 26/10/06, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > With 10 threads, the 8 client test takes 1589ms. With 20 it takes 1190 > > > and increasing to 30 threads did not improve that any further. > > > > Do you have 2 and 4 client results with 20 threads? > > 2 clients: 376 > 4 clients: 632 > > RG
