I think the MINA build in our svn is the only one which we can currently use. Martin is (afaik) in mid-commit of the MINA changes he & Robert have contributed to their project, which we need for Qpid.
Martin can update us when he's about, but I don't belive the merge is complete yet. Not sure when MINA will rebuild with our changes. Can you use the version in svn for now ? Marnie On 11/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 11, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Steve Vinoski wrote: > I'm not sure how or why we decided to move to a snapshot build of > the Mina stuff, but I think it's potentially going to cause big > problems. In the test/maven work I'm doing this weekend, I let > maven pick up the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT of the Mina stuff, assuming it was > equivalent to whatever snapshot we've committed to the local lib > directories. That was a bad assumption -- I finally figured out > that when we run against the Mina snapshot jars from the maven > repository, the PoolingFilter is not initialized or destroyed > correctly, and many tests fail miserably. > > This is bad, obviously, as it greatly decreases Qpid stability. Can > anyone explain why we moved to what seems to be a very particular > interim snapshot of the Mina stuff? I'll continue to poke around > and see if I can fix Qpid to work with the maven snapshot, but in > general, do we really want to expose ourselves to what seems like > unstable code? Should we instead go back to 0.9.5? Looks like Mina 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT is no longer available, but I tried 1.0.0 with my maven stuff and it seems to work. --steve
