The updated build.xml is now in the trunk and should address both points 1 and 5 of Brian's email.
On 16/11/06, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Gordon I just realised that was what Brian was referring to. I also realised that windows has been creating the initial directory for me. I thought the files were all included in a directory so I have adjusted that aswell. On 16/11/06, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Ritchie wrote: > > Brian, > > > > What version of ant were you using? I just checked out M1 and did > > ant > > ant std-release > > and everything worked fine. > > I'm using ant 1.6.5 with java 1.5.0_08 on XP. > > I don't believe I have any local peculiarities that would impact the > > builds. > > > > My only thoughts are that the systests where not checked out for some > > reason. Can you do an svn update and try again for us. > > I believe the point is that the released source tarball doesn't build > (i.e. it is not an issue of building from svn). I get the same error. > > It looks like the systests aren't part of the released source, but they > are still referred to by the build file (i.e. the 'preparereleasesrc' > copies only broker, client, common & cluster, but the build target > iterates over all the listed modules of which systests is one). > > I'm not sure whether the intention is to ship systests, or whether we > need to ensure that the shipped build file can cope without it being there. > -- Martin Ritchie
-- Martin Ritchie
