Marnie,
I believe that I have all the documentation I need for to correct it. I
will do so.
Carl.
Marnie McCormack wrote:
Hi Cliff,
Thanks for the feedback.
I've spoken to John about the spec license issue and his will be
raising it
at the protocol working group today with a view to it being urgently
addressed for Apache use.
Will action/check on the other open items shortly.
Regards,
Marnie
On 11/21/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/20/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Cliff,
>
> Thanks for the great feedback. I will start working on these items.
> I will wait for a full review by you (and others as well) before
> cutting another RC.
> Hopefully if I receive all the feedback today I could do it at night
> or maybe first thing in the morning.
Here's the only other stuff I came up with during a more thorough
review:
1. For some reason there's a duplicate set of LICENSE in the /java
directory of the -src distro. While not needed, it's okay to be there
as long as you keep it in synch with the root copy.
2. The src distribution seems to have two specs directory, one at the
root and one in /src. Was this intentional?
3. The spec license also needs to be mentioned in the LICENSE file
just like the other licenses.
4. And this is the most significant item: the license for the spec
appears to still not include the right to 'distribute'. I pointed
this issue out when this project was being proposed. It definitely
needs to be fixed before including the spec in an Apache distribution.
Cliff
