On 11/20/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marnie McCormack wrote: > Hi Cliff, > > Thanks very much for progressing this for us. > > It has been encouraging to read such thoughtful and pragmatic > responses from > Leo and Henri. > > My reading of their responses is that if we cannot use a MINA release, we > can proceed with the snapshot if the MINA team do not object and there > are > valid reasons for doing so (and we follow the advice about declaring the > snapshot appropriately. > > Is this how you read the feedback ?
Yes -- but be sure to read Leo's "== next steps ==" section. I think he spells out a few qpid-specific details there that also seem pretty reasonable to me.
I know Robert has been speaking with MINA team. Looking through all those mails on the MINA list I would guess the next step would be write a mail that copies both the MINA and Qpid lists and ask if they would create us one case (3). if not we then need to document the details to release M1 under case (4)
Yep - that makes sense as a start to me, but see Leo's "== next steps ==" for more details. Let me know if any of those steps don't make sense to any of you -- they all seem reasonable to me. Cliff
