The MINA team are hoping to build a release bu Wed next week fyi.
(I've been following the MINA dev list) Marnie On 11/23/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I fully agree. On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Steve, > > I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's > unless the > Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in > the > next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot > issue > with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes > the > bugs, I would stick with that for M2 and re-examine the API issues > when > there is some commitment from them to be able to produce a non- > snapshot > version. (a beta would be OK as long as it's uploaded to the maven > repositories) > > Dan > > > > On Thursday November 23 2006 12:54 pm, Martin Ritchie wrote: >> I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not >> actually cut yet.. no response >> >> Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us >> using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision >> 463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure >> what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the >> code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a >> single >> bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code >> would be available but it state where the source came from and what >> reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm >> new >> to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the >> software than to let people actually use it. :D >> >> On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to >>> convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on >>> the snapshot maven repository? >>> >>> --steve >>> >>> On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote: >>>> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92? >>>> page=comments#action_12452295 ] >>>> >>>> Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92: >>>> ------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a >>>> local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release >>>> to use. >>>> >>>>> Implement Mina API changes >>>>> -------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Key: QPID-92 >>>>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92 >>>>> Project: Qpid >>>>> Issue Type: Bug >>>>> Components: Java Broker, Java Client >>>>> Affects Versions: M1 >>>>> Reporter: Martin Ritchie >>>>> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie >>>>> Fix For: M2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> See: >>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/% >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> -- >>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>>> - >>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the >>>> administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ >>>> Administrators.jspa >>>> - >>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ >>>> software/jira > > -- > J. Daniel Kulp > Principal Engineer > IONA > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
