Paul,
I have added this disclaimer to the notices file.
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I've looked at the issue of you guys shipping with JMS. In general it
is not good to ship Java Platform Interface (java.* javax.*)
interfaces without passing the relevant TCK. However, as long as you
label this release correctly, we should be ok.
So please include clear documentation that this release does not pass
the TCK tests and that the JMS support is "alpha" or "beta" and not
compliant with the JMS spec.
Paul
On 11/27/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that we have worked through the issues found for M1. The only
item that I know
of is the addition of the svn commands that Cliff posted today as
follow-up to go and get
the MINA snapshot which is a nice touch I think we should add. (Thanks
to all those that
helped in some way)
Aside from that, if you see anything on M1 speak up now... if there are
no issues raised
then I think we can begin a vote thread for M1 Tuesday the 28th,
(tomorrow) I will do so
sometime latter in the day, unless Rajith wants to do that :-)
Regards
Carl.
