On Nov 30, 2006, at 3:13 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 29/11/06, Vinoski, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1. There's still much more test reorg work to do, I think. I
believe QPID-111 covers part of this, but should be augmented with
a comment along these lines.
In fact, there's a ton of test work to be done, given that the
broker has only 2-4% unit test coverage, and common has even less.
--steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 5:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [java] Can we run only unit tests as part of the build ?
Hi folks,
Can we just run only unit tests as part of the build and lets have a
different goal to run integration tests.
creating connections or waiting for connections inside unit tests
kinda of
slows things down.
lets keep the unit tests to check simple functionality and move
all the
other time consuming tests to a different goal.
thoughts ??
Regards,
Rajith
I think 2-4% is a bit of an underestimate. A lot of the broker
functionality is tested through the various other tests that create a
connection and send messages.
True, but note that I specifically said *unit test* coverage. With
the unit tests, the broker coverage is indeed 2-4%.
--steve
