Re: better --help output for qpidd; new option --version

[Jim Meyering]

Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doing this patch

Thank you.

> but having build issues. will figure them out tomorrow.

Details?  Without those, it's much harder to help.

Here's one more piece, without which "make check" won't compile:

2006-12-06  Jim Meyering  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        * tests/ConfigurationTest.cpp: Update conf.parse callers.

Index: tests/ConfigurationTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- tests/ConfigurationTest.cpp (revision 482944)
+++ tests/ConfigurationTest.cpp (working copy)
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
     {
         Configuration conf;
         char* argv[] = {"ignore", "--help"};
-        conf.parse(2, argv);
+        conf.parse("t1", 2, argv);
         CPPUNIT_ASSERT(conf.isHelp());
     }
 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
     {
         Configuration conf;
         char* argv[] = {"ignore", "--port", "6789"};
-        conf.parse(3, argv);
+        conf.parse("t1", 3, argv);
         CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(6789, conf.getPort());
     }
 
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
     {
         Configuration conf;
         char* argv[] = {"ignore", "-p", "6789"};
-        conf.parse(3, argv);
+        conf.parse("t1", 3, argv);
         CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(6789, conf.getPort());
     }
 
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
     {
         Configuration conf;
         char* argv[] = {"ignore", "--store", "my-store-module.so"};
-        conf.parse(3, argv);
+        conf.parse("t1", 3, argv);
         std::string expected("my-store-module.so");
         CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(expected, conf.getStore());
     }
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
     {        
         Configuration conf;
         char* argv[] = {"ignore", "-t", "--worker-threads", "10"};
-        conf.parse(4, argv);
+        conf.parse("t1", 4, argv);
         CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(5672, conf.getPort());//default
         CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(10, conf.getWorkerThreads());
         CPPUNIT_ASSERT(conf.isTrace());