On Dec 11, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 11/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> Steve Vinoski wrote:
>> When I raise the testing issue in this list, as I've already done
>> on numerous occasions, I usually get next to nothing in terms of
>> feedback. Do others share my concerns about this whole testing
>> issue? Do we as a group agree on the value of overhauling and
>> enhancing our tests?
>
> Yes, I agree that more (and better organised) tests would be a very
> good thing.
Thanks Gordon, Alan, Rajith, and Jim for your responses.
Just so I'm clear on this: the java/client/src/test/java/org/apache/
qpid directory currently contains all of the following:
<snip/>
Of all these, only specific tests under the test/unit subdirectory
are currently being executed as unit tests, as specified by the
includes/excludes configured for Surefire in client/pom.xml. What I'm
proposing as a first step is moving everything listed here except for
the test subdirectory into a temporary src/old_test directory, also
under client, keeping the full package name for each test of course.
That way, I can remove the includes/excludes from the Surefire
configuration in the pom without us losing anything.
I would also do something similar for the systests directory.
Any reason why I shouldn't do this? Speak now...
--steve
This would be great. I've been meaning to do this since we created
JIRA-39 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-39) just haven't
got down the list of bugs far enough :D
Thanks for that pointer, Martin -- I didn't see QPID-39, so I'll add
some comments to it.
I've gone ahead and reorganized the client and systests as I
explained earlier. With this test reorg, all the client tests now
pass under Eclipse. There appears to be one failure under Eclipse in
the systests, however, which I'll look into.
thanks,
--steve
