On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 15:50 -0500, Steve Vinoski wrote: > But breaking trunk presumes there's no other work using it, which > isn't the case. For example, Robert has been moving some performance- > related tests around to be able to test the effects of all the > recent > JMS-related changes, and Tej is still finishing up his queue > browsing > work. I've been doing work related to the distribution, to fix > issues > that would prevent M2. Martin or Marnie might be doing some other > work on the trunk as well. > > Deliberately breaking trunk, even if it's a ploy to force people to > get involved to fix it, just seems like a bad idea IMO. You can have > the work on a branch and still have multiple people working on it, > and that way you don't break the work of others. > > --steve
I can work it either way. If this will be too disruptive on the trunk then a branch will work as well. Kim
